Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 09:37 AM [
Egyptian]
My Totem
I'm a water and air creature. I don't consider the 4 elements either masculine or feminine exclusively...I think Air and Earth have different qualities, non-related to gender
Water - Feminine
Fire - Masculine
Air - Equilibrator (A Synthesis or the Hermaphrodite)
Earth - The manifestation of all 3 other elements combined.
These relationships are integral to the Quarter workings in most Ceremonial Work, and are influenced to some degree by Alchemy, but I see these same relationships mirrored in the Heliopolitan Cosmology of Ancient Egypt as well. Horus was not part of the Ennead, but the manifestation of the 9. The Pharoah, as his embodiment more directly represented the physicality of the process of manifestation.
Shu And Tefnut (Heat and Moisture) are primal to the concepts of Fire and Water, but are not, yet, in their state, elemental. Geb and Nuit more represent the Earth and the Firmament (ruach, air, heavens), but once again, are more conceptual, the prototype of the elements of Earth and Air.
It breaks down sort of like this.
Atum-Ra is the Primal Source
Shu and Tefnut are the primal duality of active and receptive, and are like the cosmic soup, with Shu being the motion of the primal source and Tefnut being the substance of the primal source. They establish the polarity of two opposite sides of the circle, always connected, but in opposing/complementary states.
Geb and Nut establish the polarity of Above and Below, or Internal and External, Esoteric and Exoteric.
With the 4 children of Geb and Nut, we have established the denser forms of these two polarities:
Aset and Asar represent Feminine Light and Masculine Light
Nebt-Het and Set represent the Feminine Dark and the Masculine Dark
so in this quarternary we have represented the polarity of Light and Dark, as well as Feminine and Masculine.
It is not hard to follow that the Egyptian religion relied heavily on Dualities, but not in the same manner as monotheistic religions, where the division is altered by the concept of Good and Evil. This was a more natural appropriation of the cosmic polarity that is responsible for creation, but always empowered by the One.
It was not until about the Middle Kingdom that intellectual development began to actively verbalize and record the philosophy of the One Source, embodied as Amun, but this was simply a revelation of the non-verbal assumption of an original Creator. For one to be a devotee of Amun, one had to only carry Amun in your Heart, in other words to acknowledge Amun. Had the priests not gotten so powerful, and threatened the power of the King, the foundation would not have been created for Aten, and a brutal dictatorship. The original solar hymns were to Amun, not Aten, and later solar hymns to Aten were based solidly in the former. You can find some of them word for word in Psalms in the Tanakh.
It was not until the heresy of Akhenaten that one was either a worshipper of Aten, or a 'sinner' or evil. His worship was enforced with great brutality, no doubt because of the unnatural representation of Divinity that it forced upon a people who saw the Divine in the complexity of Nature, and were used to a freedom of representation that allowed definition of spiritual principles. While it did not last, there is a great deal of scholarship offering strong circumstantial evidence for a relationship with the worship of Aten with the early Hebrew religion.
I prefer Egyptian, excluding Aten worship, because of the interactive manner in which the people woshipped the Divine. They did not have a word for "god" because that particular concept as we know it does not apply to the manner in which they perceived the Divine. They called the Netjer (neecher) and this term more closely translates to "essence" or "principle". It is easy to assign a spiritual power an animal form when you think of all creation as sacred. I disagree with any scholarship that defines the early worship as strictly 'animism'. I believe it is a little more complex. Animism basically is a process by which the animal is elevated spiritually to embrace a specific power, but my argument is the original mindset already conceived of the animal as sacred, and the manner of worship simply reflected the natural abilities of that animal as the earthly representation of a correlating universal or cosmic energy. The relationship was reciprocal, and elevation of the animal as something it was already was unnecessary.
Just some thoughts....
Leave a Comment | View All Comments